Saturday, January 11, 2014

The logic of a queer black feminist

Afrafemme, a woman who describes herself as a "queer black feminist," had some silly words to belch:
white people who act like they hate other white people or hate whiteness are annoying.
like. no you dont hate white people & you dont hate whiteness.
you will forever love both. cuz you benefit from it. & you feel completely comfortable around other white people. & dont you dare lie & say you dont.
So even though white conservatives hate Hillary Clinton, they still love her.

In response to it, she received the following anonymous message from a white eunuch:
I agree that 99% of racially aware white people love being white and endorse their benefits and I'm not here to defend them, just myself because I truly do not understand how poc [people of color] can go about their days with white people around. I'll never be not white and the benefits are nice but I'd give them because the pain is not worth it.
To which Afrafemme responded not at all unreasonably:
wait. you’re only here to defend yourself? right. cuz thats not white supremacist or self-righteous at all. smh.
White people--when you weep and blubber for black people to forgive you for being born white, you're still being racist, a white supremacist even. So knock that off. You get no credit from blacks, and you look like a pantywaist to self-respecting whites. Blacks will never like you; accept it.
12 Years a Slave is hailed by critics as a long-awaited breakthrough that finally dares to mention the subject of slavery after decades of the entertainment industry being controlled by the South.


- Steve Sailer's deliciously sarcastic take
on the black-propaganda movie

Knockout: it's a black thang

CBS ran a sugarcoated segment on a street game called Knockout.

As a middle-aged black man explains to the camera, “Knockout is a game that a lot of our teenagers play, just where they dare one of the guys to just randomly choose anybody walking down the street.”

The segment shows a home-video recording of a white man seemingly in the middle of giving directions to the black teens in the video, when suddenly the black male he’s directly speaking to lunges forward with a fist to his temple. The white man, heavyset, falls flat on his back onto the concrete, out cold.

Spread throughout CBS’s segment on Knockout are interviews with blacks in their late teens. Each of them knows what the game is and only one of them manages to say that “dey shouldn’t be doin’ it.”

In one interview, three black males face the camera, their faces blurred. When prompted by the interviewer off-camera, the one in the middle explains the game.

"The game Knockout is like when people bored, dey, uh, see where dey [unintelligible mumbling], and whoeva come walkin’ down the block a’ suh’n ["or something"], dey jus’ knock ‘em out." As he’s explaining this, his two friends behind him are having a good laugh about it all, no doubt recalling with fondness the last time they struck cold an innocent white person in the temples.

Two more interviews follow with two more groups of blacks, both of them explaining the game as nonchalantly as if it’s as harmless as giving noogies to a friend.

Then we see CCTV footage of a white schoolteacher walking through an alley towards a populated sidewalk. He’s perhaps 40 feet from the end of the alley when a pack of six black teens enters the alley from the sidewalk end.

At this point, the teacher is probably thinking one of two things. If he is a leftist, he was probably thinking, “Ah, the diversity in this city is so wonderful. I’m not worried that I’m about to walk past a group of six blacks in an alley. In fact, I’m so titillated that I get to show how anti-racist I am, it’s giving me a diversi-boner.” Or, if he is a rightist, he was probably thinking, “Oh, God, what do I do? If I act like I’m afraid of them, they’ll accuse me of being racist, beat me, and take my wallet. Just breathe. Keep walking forward, give a courtesy smile, and breathe.”

He keeps walking toward them and they keep walking toward him. As they pass each other, sure enough, one of them darts out with his fist, makes solid connection with the man’s head, and he’s passed out before he hits the ground. His head slams onto the curb. There is a moment of celebration—putting fists up to their mouths in that way that they do, and pointing at the broken cracker in the gutter—and they continue on their happy way.

More CCTV footage in the CBS segment shows a white woman walking down the sidewalk by herself. No one is around, but approaching at stealthy jog from behind her comes a black male teenager. “Perhaps she dropped an earring and he wants to return it to her,” thinks the delusional leftist. “Oh, crap, she’s in trouble,” knows the race-realist.

When he reaches her, he swings his long arm in a wide arc and lands his fist against the side of her head, launching her unconscious body forward and to the side, hitting the concrete flat like a rag doll. The black turns around and jogs back in the direction he came from, likely to meet up with the homies he was no doubt entertaining in knocking out the white woman. You can imagine them jumping up and down in primitive celebration, resembling the prehistoric chimpanzees in the beginning of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

The video of the segment can be seen at ConservativeVideos.com, which introduces the video with the politically correct title, “The Sick ‘Game’ Thugs Are Violently Playing On Innocent Pedestrians.”

"Thugs"? There are black thugs and there are white thugs, but not a single of the thugs in the videos was white. The problem, then, it can be reasoned, is not thugs; the problem is blacks. Why can’t we just say it?

The CBS interviewer, at the end of the segment, asks the middle-aged black man who appeared at the beginning, “What’s the point [of Knockout]? Is it a macho thing?”

"It’s a macho thing," the black man responds with a nod. But he knows better.

It’s a black thing.

Pastor James David Manning

When people on the far right say the sort of things Pastor James Manning says in the video below, conservative eunuchs make an embarrassing effort to decry them as racist.



Click for full resolution


Muslim crime in Britain

SomeOfMyBestFriendsAreWhite posted this wonderful roundup of news stories of Muslim filth in Britain. Click each for a pop-up of the full-resolution version.













Friday, January 10, 2014

Ben Carson to Conservatives: Stop Letting "Racist" Label Bother You!

Ben Carson, the black neurosurgeon whom Republicans wish to run for President just because he's black and is against Obamacare, wrote at WashingtonTimes.com, "Too many people are willing to listen to the inflammatory rhetoric of the dividers who happily toss out accusations of racism against critics of the president of the United States whenever people disagree with his policies."

He's right. Conservatives listen to the left's rhetoric of which he speaks; when they are accused of racism, they start sniveling about how they're not racist. "Please, you've got to believe us!"

I say, so what if conservatives are racist? So what? You need to stop letting it bother you. By worrying about the names the Left calls you, you shrink yourselves and elevate them to superiority. The moment you start worrying about their labels for you, you're then in their possession. They own you.

Elizabeth Wright was a reclusive black Libertarian blogger who unfortunately passed away in 2011. But she once wrote that "Racism is not 'sin'" and besought white conservatives to stop being soft-touches and cowards.

"Over the years," she wrote, "as whites have worked to defend themselves against the charge of 'racism,' they have validated this slur by giving it greater importance than it deserves, and thereby helped to institutionalize it as the world’s greatest 'sin.'"

In case what this black woman is saying is too unfathomable a concept, let me put it bluntly: Grow a pair, white conservatives!

By acting affronted when you're accused of racism, you're validating the word "racist" as an effective insult. Stop denying accusations of racism. If the Left constantly accused you of being child rapists, would you keep denying it? Or, realizing their flagrant stupidity, their blatant attempts to suck you into their world of hysterics, would you turn the tables on them and ask, "What point are you trying to make?"

I'll leave you to ruminate on this excerpt from another piece by the aforementioned Miss Wright (remember, she was a black woman):
[N]othing has changed in the White middle-class mindset and…fear of the “racist” label continues to rule as strongly as ever. We’ve now learned for certain that such Whites are determined never to put the name to their fear and anxiety. If anything, they are fighting all the harder to bury even deeper the visceral knowledge of what is going on in this country and the inevitable future that is on its way.
Even as other groups gradually dispossess them in the country whose political system was constructed by their forebears, conservative Whites persist in their obstinate assertion that their apparent discontent is “not about race.” What hogwash. Of course it’s about race and culture. Why shouldn’t it be? No matter how assiduously they deny it, resentment is growing over the ever-looming fact that this country, due to swiftly altering demographics, will no longer be the product of those Founders. And reality informs us that the ruling law, that is, the Constitution (or what’s left of it), soon will be openly renounced by competing populations that never have had even the remotest historical connection to the notions set forth by those Englishmen.

Race: White?

The image below is of a few dozen mugshots of (mostly) obviously non-white criminals whose races are listed as white. Of course you can't see it unless you view the full-res version here.


"You may not be interested in race war, but race war is interested in you."

College liberal

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Is it truly unfair that black school kids get punished more than whites?

The Left so truly believes there are no differences among the various races other than in their outer appearances that they've become blind to what is so painfully obvious.
From AP:
The Obama administration is urging schools to abandon overly zealous discipline policies that civil rights advocates have long said lead to a school-to-prison pipeline that discriminates against minority students.
That they've "long said" this means they've long been blind.

The official disciplinary policies of schools do not discriminate. Are some teachers and principals discriminating? Perhaps they are, perhaps they aren't. I'll explain shortly why they should.

Attorney General Eric Holder blames zero-tolerance policies, which, as AP describes them, "often spell out uniform and swift punishment for offenses such as truancy, smoking or carrying a weapon. Violators can lose classroom time or become saddled with a criminal record."

The Left's logic, such as it is, is that black kids are in trouble for truancy more often than whites because school administrators simply ignore or don't punish as harshly the white truants. The reality is in contradiction with their logic, though; are black kids not the ones usually skipping school? Of course they are; they want to skip school, smoke marijuana, and loiter on sidewalks harassing passing women.

How about carrying a weapon? More blacks are punished for carrying a weapon than whites are. Does this mean discipline is not as harsh for white students who bring weapons to school, or does it mean that blacks more often bring weapons to school?

Considering that blacks bring guns even to baptisms, I think we know the answer to that. Whereas the NRA teaches us to respect guns, rap music teaches blacks to treat guns merely as dangerous toys effective at threatening people who irk you.

The Left often accuses the justice system of being racist as well, and for equally illogical reasons. A white man kills his wife, gets twenty years; a black man kills his wife, gets life. It seems wrong, if you look at it so shallowly, as does the Left.

What they don't bother learning is whether the black man had a history of any other felonies or of abusing his wife (which is usually the case with blacks), or whether the murder was premeditated or in the heat of the moment. These factors affect sentencing.

It's the same with school discipline.

The AP:
In American schools, black students without disabilities were more than three times as likely as whites to be expelled or suspended, according to government civil rights data collection from 2011-2012. Although black students made up 15 percent of students in the data collection, they made up more than a third of students suspended once, 44 percent of those suspended more than once and more than a third of students expelled.
There is actually nothing unseemly about that at all. It's more or less in line with the rate of black violence in America. When controlling for their relative low population here, blacks commit the majority of the crime. It's just a statistical fact (and therefore a racist one) that if they weren't here, the crime rate of America wouldn't be so shameful; it'd be envied.

Physical attributes are affected by race, which everybody accepts. But this also means, therefore, that brain formation is affected by race, and, therefore, behavior is affected by race.

It's totally natural for black kids to be punished in school more often since they break the rules more often. What isn't natural is that America still tolerates it by not subjecting them to harsher punishments than we give others.

"Police: 14-Year-Old Attempts To Rob Taxi Driver At Gunpoint"

- Only fourteen years old?! Wha--

- Yeah, he was a black kid.

- Oh. Nevermind.

Source: CBS

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

"Perhaps the oddest thing about the experts and police chiefs and reporters and editors and tenured professors who constantly tell us that these black-on-white atrocities aren’t racially motivated, is that blacks don’t believe that for a second. They know that they are racially motivated, they say so, and they celebrate them for it."